Who’s watching the
“Gatekeeper’s”? You know, the
self-appointed people who make it their business to determine what is right,
wrong, good, bad, legal/illegal for everyone else. My Libertarian leanings are acknowledged
here. However, there is more going on in
the regard to simple human freedom and the responsibility that accompanies
individual freedoms.
Stay with me. I’m not endorsing or advocating some of the
things under attack, or being “gated,” but I am simply asking who is watching
those who are in charge of what is acceptable and what isn’t in culture,
government, policy, morality, etc.?
Most recent is the game of
football. There is a movement to get rid
of the game. Don’t laugh if you are from
the South. It’s real and it’s not going
away. Concussions are bad. No one would argue otherwise. Football needs to be as safe as possible and
especially for students. However, it
seems those using the NFL head injury cases (Junior Seau, etc.) as their base are
ignoring the fact that every one of the players currently suing the NFL over
head trauma made a personal decision to play the game. Not to mention the fact that they benefited
financially from it. And many are flat
broke by other decisions they freely made.
They chose to put themselves at risk.
They knew football was potentially dangerous and violent. It’s like driving 120 MPH, knowing full well
it’s against the law, crashing and then suing the guy you wrecked. C’mon man accept responsibility.
Why aren’t these
“Gatekeepers” going after UFC, wrestling, boxing, or for goodness sake “X”
Games athlete’s? How about
skydivers? What about mountain
climbers? And let’s not forget those
crazy Red Bull human flight contraptions jumping off cliffs in California. And dare I mention riding motorcycles without
a helmet. Watch out Harley owners you
will be next! Personally, I think riding
a motorcycle without a helmet, or driving a car without a seatbelt simply lacks
commonsense and ignores the facts. But
it’s your body. You make the
choice. But be willing to accept
responsibility for the choice!
You can do the homework. From tobacco, school lunches, coal, sugared
colas in NYC, football, gun ownership, and corporate or personal opinions on
morality that are now deemed “hate speech” simply because a business or
individual holds a different opinion than the Hollywood agenda. Isn’t it interesting that alcohol kills far
more people than guns, or football and NO ONE in this group goes after the
alcohol industry! Why? I guess too many “Gatekeepers,” imbibe!
I’m not advocating behaviors
and life decisions that mean death. I
don't like sugared colas, but can you guarantee that coffee won’t be next on
Bloomberg’s list? I am simply asking at
what point did the exercise of personal freedom have to go before a panel to
determine what is permissible and what isn’t?
Here’s the problem. At some point
everyone and every activity will be drawn out of the circle! Legalism has always been this way. The Apostle Paul fought it all over
Galatians. The legalizers kept drawing
circles tighter and tighter. Freedom
scared the bejeebers out of them. They
couldn’t stand someone being able to believe something different and letting them
be responsible for it. Conformity became
the dominant name of the game. At the end of the day it’s ALL about one word:
CONTROL! The Gatekeepers believe they
know what is best for you and you don’t.
So the only way to get you to conform is through policy, law, or public
condemnation that closely resembles character assassination. Those who believe in the exercise of freedom
believe the culture/market ultimately self-corrects. The truly bad ideas become like tape that
didn’t make the show on an editing room floor.
My car speedometer goes to
140 MPH. Do I drive 140 MPH? No.
Could I? I suppose (but the
engine would blow up first, LOL), but I don’t.
I exercise judgment. I choose not
to go 140 MPH. If I do, I risk being
arrested for speeding and reckless driving.
Just because I have 3-4 regular Cokes in my fridge doesn’t mean I’m
going to drink them. In fact I
don’t. However, someone may come to my
house that prefers all that sugar and caffeine to one of my diet drinks. I will gladly serve them one upon
request. However, should they develop
diabetes, heart trouble, or obesity, they will face the consequences for their
choice and the exercise of their freedom.
Their free choice of a sugared drink is not my responsibility. But some believe it’s not only their job, but
their calling to “police” the rest of us.
Let’s push this even farther,
but before you read on this isn’t a “Right to Life” rant. The “Gatekeepers” adamantly support the right
to abortion. You don’t have to be rocket
scientist, or doctor to surmise that the actual act of abortion is violent to
the fetus. Watch one and tell me otherwise.
Yet, in America it is perfectly legal.
Every day women make decisions, hopefully with responsible medical
professionals and counselors about this issue.
They are free to act. They must
accept the consequences regardless of their choice. But let’s be clear, they make the
choice.
Yes, I am pro-life (all the
way, I don’t support the death penalty because I am truly, Pro-Life, which
might even surprise the “Gatekeepers”), but if a woman makes the decision to
get an abortion it’s my role as a pastor and Christ-follower to provide
unconditional love, counsel and support to her, just as I must to the woman who
chooses not to have an abortion. I don’t
even get to judge according to Scripture.
That said, I would not counsel abortion, but neither would I brand a
woman who has had one with a scarlet letter.
She must accept responsibility for her free choice and she will live
with it the rest of her life.
Now isn’t it ironic that the
very people choosing to gate keep on gun control, football, food, tobacco,
marriage and a host of other issues allow the exercise of freedom for
terminating a life, when in 38 states it’s felony murder to kill a baby inside
a woman’s womb by harming her by way of gun, beating, vehicle, etc.? I’m with Paul, “Where the Spirit of the Lord
is there is liberty.”
Freedom is messy. It’s what makes our country and my faith
choice different. You can stand on a
street corner with the proper permit and blast Christianity, Islam, or Atheism. You may be wrong, but you are free do
exercise free speech. And while I may find
your speech offensive and hateful, it is the exercise of your freedom that
allows me to exercise my freedom of a polar opposite view. And that freedom comes with great
responsibility! It’s a freedom that
actually embraces your right to be offensive to me without trying to control
you.
I find great irony in the
fact that most ideologues spout the free exercise of the exchange of ideas, but
they are unwilling to let it play out, unless you share their view. And what is the definition of arrogance and
narcissism? By the way, before you
dismiss this, as a rant for one side of the political aisle, don’t!
“Gatekeepers” live on both sides of the political aisle. They hold freedom hostage. It’s just my opinion so feel FREE to disagree.